ACM logo ACM motto image
USACM
is the U.S. Public Policy Council of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ... (more)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


February 29, 2008

VVSG Comment Period Extended

In November the EAC began a 120 day comment period on the next iteration of the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines, which are the Federal standards for all voting equipment. Today the EAC extended that deadline by another 60 days, pushing it to roughly May 5. USACM plans to file comments.

To review and comment on the standards follow this link.

Cameron posted this at 10:02 am ET | Filed in E-voting | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
February 25, 2008

Hill Tech Happenings, Week of February 25

February 26
Hearing:
The Research and Science Education Subcommittee of the House Science and Technology Subcommittee will hold an oversight hearing on the National Science Foundation.
10 a.m., 2318 Rayburn Building

February 27
Hearing:
The Financial Services and General Government Subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee will hold a hearing on election administration. The Commissioners of the Election Assistance Commission are scheduled to testify.
10 a.m., 2359 Rayburn Building
(more…)

David B. posted this at 10:15 am ET | Filed in Events, Hill Tech Happenings | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
February 22, 2008

‘08 Tech Policy Outlook: Health Privacy and Health IT

A policy goal - like privacy protections - that has been tried repeatedly over the last few years has been legislation or other efforts to encourage the adoption of health information technology. Previous attempts have stalled somewhere in the halls of Congress, and the most recent health legislation - HIPAA - the Health Insurance Portability and Acountability Act has prompted criticism from some that the bill overregulates and from others that health privacy is at risk. This year there are two bills that legislators will try and navigate through Congress that stand the best chance of becoming law. There will no doubt be others, but the two I will discuss below have already attracted the attention of those groups interested in health privacy and health information technology (like with many other issues, privacy is a factor in health information technology).

The Wired Act, S 1693, sponsored by Senator Kennedy (D-MA) and co-sponsored by 12 other senators (including the two Democratic presidential contenders), was introduced last year and has been approved by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. Its focus is on health information technology. The bill, in its current form (which is available online), would do the following (among other things):
(more…)

David B. posted this at 7:36 am ET | Filed in Privacy, Healthcare | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
February 17, 2008

‘08 Tech. Policy Outlook: Filtering Reality

This year action on large or overarching changes to copyright policy is a long-shot. Nonetheless, Congress may address two copyright issues related to technology policy – increased penalties related to copyright infringement and technology-based filtering of protected content. With filtering legislation already moving through Congress, this post takes a closer look at this issue.

(more…)

Cameron posted this at 10:17 am ET | Filed in Intellectual Property, P2P, Analysis | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
February 13, 2008

Increases Proposed for Basic Research Agencies; NIST Proposes New Cyber Security Program

For the past few years we’ve been following funding for three key physical science agencies – The National Science Foundation (NSF), The Department of Energy Office of Science (DoE), and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Last week the President released his proposed budget for fiscal year 2009, which contains some healthy increases for these agencies. Below is snapshot table of the proposal and a more detailed look at NIST’s budget, and, as usual, CRA has in-depth coverage as well.

(more…)

Cameron posted this at 10:19 pm ET | Filed in Research, Security, Funding, Analysis | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
February 8, 2008

Task Force Recommends Dismissing Florida 13 Contest

As noted in a previous blog post, this morning the Task Force on the contested Florida 13th District election met briefly to hear the final report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO). The GAO was asked to review the election machines (and previously conducted tests of those machines) used in Sarasota County in order to determine their role in the high undervote rate for that particular election.

In testimony this morning (available at the GAO website), the GAO indicated in their testing that they could find no evidence that the voting machines contributed to the undervotes. Since the scope of their investigation was limited to the machines, they cannot - and did not - make any conclusions about what did contribute to the undervotes. The GAO report does note that a paper trail would have made their investigations a lot easier by providing an independent means of confirming the accuracy of the machine vote.

As a result of this testimony, the Task Force voted unanimously to recommend that the Committee on House Administration dismiss the contest of the 2006 election in Florida’s 13th District. The full committee will act soon on this recommendation. How the public responds to this, in Florida or elsewhere, is anyone’s guess.

David B. posted this at 11:20 am ET | Filed in E-voting | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
February 7, 2008

USACM Submits Letter Commenting on New Holt Legislation

Yesterday USACM sent a letter to Representative Rush Holt commenting on his newest piece of electronic voting legislation, HR 5036. The bill, the Emergency Assistance for Secure Elections Act of 2008, provides money to jurisdictions that rely on DRE voting machines to purchase paper trail systems in time for the general election. At the same time, USACM indicated a need for further electronic voting reform, such as the reforms discussed in Rep. Holt’s other e-voting legislation, HR 811, currently stalled in the House.

From the letter:
(more…)

David B. posted this at 12:44 pm ET | Filed in E-voting, ACM/USACM News | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
February 6, 2008

ACM to Cosponsor Tribute to Jim Gray

On May 31, 2008, ACM, IEEE-CS and the University of California, Berkley, along with family and colleagues, will host a tribute and a technical symposium honoring Dr. Jim Gray. Dr. Gray has been missing at sea since January 2007. He is a former Turing Award winner (widely considered as the top prize in the computing field) and was considered a visionary in the field of computing, particularly as a database expert.

Some details are below. Here is the website:

http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/ipro/jimgraytribute

Tribute to Honor Jim Gray
May 31, 2008
University of California, Berkeley

A Tribute to Honor Jim Gray: Legendary computer science pioneer, known for his groundbreaking work as a programmer, database expert, engineer, and his caring contributions as a teacher and mentor.

General Session
Zellerbach Hall, UCB
9:00 am – 10:30 am

Speakers:
Shankar Sastry, Joe Hellerstein, Pauline Boss, Mike Olson, Paula Hawthorn, Mike Harrison, Pat Helland, Ed Lazowska, Mike Stonebraker, David Vaskevitch, Rick Rashid, Stuart Russell
All are welcome. Registration is not required.

Technical Session
Wheeler Hall, UCB
Please see website for session times.

Presenters:
Bruce Lindsay, John Nauman, David DeWitt, Gordon Bell, Andreas Reuter, Tom Barclay, Alex Szalay, Curtis Wong, Ed Saade, Jim Bellingham
All are welcome. Registration is required, see below.

Cameron posted this at 2:25 pm ET | Filed in ACM/USACM News, People | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
February 5, 2008

ACM Washington Update, Vol. 12.2 (February 5, 2008)

CONTENTS

[1] Newsletter Highlights
[2] ACM Groups Urge Actions to Broaden Web Accessibility
[3] ACM Announces 2007 Turing Award Winners
[4] ACM Public Policy Office Assesses Technology Policy in 2008
[5] USACM Criticizes the Final REAL ID Regulations
[6] Voting Study Addresses Usability Concerns
[7] FY 2008 Appropriations Significantly Affects Physical Sciences
[8] MPAA Acknowledges Flawed Study on University Downloading
[9] About USACM

[An archive of all previous editions of Washington Update is available at
http://www.acm.org/usacm/update/]
(more…)

David B. posted this at 4:57 pm ET | Filed in ACM/USACM News | Permanent Link | Trackback

 

Final Report Due on Florida 13th Election Contest

Congressional Quarterly is reporting that the Committee on House Administration’s Task Force on the Florida 13th Congressional District contested election will meet this Friday at 10 a.m. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) will present its final report on the election, and the Task Force will make its recommendation to the full committee.

The contest of this election hinges on the comparably high percentage of undervotes (where there are fewer votes for a particular race on the ballot compared to other races on the same ballot) in only one of the counties covered by this district. The State of Florida conducted tests, and the GAO has been investigating the election and the subsequent tests. Several different factors could explain the undervote issue, but so far the publicly available information about how the voting machines have performed has been, at best, inconclusive.

The meeting is scheduled for 1310 Longworth Building, Friday February 8, at 10 a.m.

David B. posted this at 9:27 am ET | Filed in E-voting | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
February 4, 2008

2007 Turing Award Winners Announced

Today ACM announced that Edmund M. Clarke, E. Allen Emerson, and Joseph Siafkis won the 2007 Turing Award. Press release is below.

ACM TURING AWARD HONORS FOUNDERS OF AUTOMATIC VERIFICATION TECHNOLOGY THAT ENABLES FASTER, MORE RELIABLE DESIGNS

Researchers Created Model Checking Technique for Hardware and Software Designers

NEW YORK, February 4, 2008 – ACM, the Association for Computing Machinery, has named Edmund M. Clarke, E. Allen Emerson, and Joseph Sifakis the winners of the 2007 A.M. Turing Award, widely considered the most prestigious award in computing, for their original and continuing research in a quality assurance process known as Model Checking. Their innovations transformed this approach from a theoretical technique to a highly effective verification technology that enables computer hardware and software engineers to find errors efficiently in complex system designs. This transformation has resulted in increased assurance that the systems perform as intended by the designers. The Turing Award, named for British mathematician Alan M. Turing, carries a $250,000 prize, with financial support provided by Intel Corporation and Google Inc. Clarke of Carnegie Mellon University, and Emerson of the University of Texas at Austin, working together, and Sifakis, working independently for the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique at the University of Grenoble in France, developed this fully automated approach that is now the most widely used verification method in the hardware and software industries.

(more…)

Cameron posted this at 9:31 pm ET | Filed in ACM/USACM News, People | Permanent Link | Trackback

 

New Voting Study Addresses Usability Concerns

In the debates about the use of electronic voting machines there is a refrain that direct electronic recorder (DRE) voting machines are much easier to use and much more accurate in capturing voter intent than other voting systems. A new comprehensive usability study of five commercial e-voting machines (published by the Brookings Institution) finds that we still have a long way to go in improving machine usability and that ballot design remains a challenging issue. We haven’t read the full study (Available from Brookings Press for $19.95), but here are some highlights from the news release and a story on MIT’s Technology Review.

While the study found voter confidence and satisfaction with the systems was good, error rate increased as voter tasks became more complex:

From the MIT Technology Review story, “… Bederson says that even for the simplest task–voting in one presidential race on a single screen–participants had an error rate of around 3 percent. When the task became more complicated, such as when voters were asked to change their selection from one candidate to another, the error rate increased to between 7 and 15 percent, depending on the system. Bederson notes that, although the error rate that occurred in the study may not necessarily mean that there is the same error rate in terms of actual votes on actual machines, the study does raise concern, considering how close some recent elections have been.”

The study has raised concerns within the computing community because it seemingly downplays security issues. The press release on the study clearly plays up that there is some tradeoff between usability and voter-verification. I suspect this is more likely to do with trying to generate a controversial enough angle for the press than the authors belief that completely software dependent voting systems are worry free. In general, we think this “tradeoff” view is flawed. There are clearly major security and reliability issues that justify having software-independent verification systems, just as there are clearly usability issues that need attention. Attention doesn’t need to be mutually exclusive.

The key to improving voting technology is careful engineering, research into voting technology and voter behavior, and strong standards and testing. We are a long way from meet these objectives. More attenion on all these issues should be the goal for election officials, vendors, technologists, and policymakers.

Cameron posted this at 11:40 am ET | Filed in E-voting, Accessibility | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
 
 
Questions? Comments?
Email us