ACM logo ACM motto image
USACM
is the U.S. Public Policy Council of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ... (more)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


January 31, 2005

ACM Washington Update Vol. 9.1 (January 31, 2005)

CONTENTS

[1] Cameron Wilson Begins as ACM Policy Office Director
[2] Numerous Briefs Filed in MGM v. Grokster Case
[3] New Legislation on National Standards for Driver’s Licenses
[4] PITAC Approves Report on Federal Cybersecurity R&D
[5] White House Names New Homeland Security Director
[6] Upcoming Events
[7] About USACM

[An archive of all previous editions of Washington Update is available here.]
(more…)

David posted this at 4:41 pm ET | Filed in ACM/USACM News, Newsletter | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
January 27, 2005

Congress Puts Spyware on Hit List

“The powerful House Commerce Committee on Wednesday made anti-spyware legislation a top priority, with members hoping to vote it out of committee in the next two to three weeks.

“This is on the fast track, and we hope to be marking this bill up in the very near future,” said committee chairman Joe Barton (R-Texas).

The committee devoted its first hearing of the new session to exploring anti-spyware bill HR29, or the Spy Act. The bill is expected to garner wide support in the House because it’s basically a reintroduction of the former HR2929, which passed the House by a 399-1 vote in the last session […]”

SOURCE: Wired News

Note: Also see the committee’s news release regarding spyware, here.

David posted this at 9:42 am ET | Filed in Privacy, Security, Surveillance | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
January 25, 2005

U.S. Asks High Court to Curb File Swapping

“The government’s top lawyer has asked the Supreme Court to overturn the ruling that allowed the makers of online song- and movie-swapping software to stay in business.

The legal brief, filed late yesterday by Acting Solicitor General Paul D. Clement, supports the entertainment industry’s bid to shut down song-swapping networks such as Kazaa and Grokster by suing them for copyright infringement.

On March 29, the Supreme Court is slated to hear arguments in MGM Studios Inc. v. Grokster Ltd., the biggest test of the legality of online file swapping. Lower courts have twice rejected entertainment-industry arguments, ruling that Grokster Ltd. and StreamCast Networks Inc. – operators of two song-swapping systems akin to the more popular Kazaa – do not violate copyright law even though people use them for illegal downloads of songs, movies and other copyrighted works […]”

SOURCE: Wash. Post

Note: The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has a good web page regarding MGM v. Grokster, including copies of all the briefs related to the case.

David posted this at 1:25 pm ET | Filed in Intellectual Property, P2P | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
January 24, 2005

Tech Firms to Seek Legal Protection From Pirating

“Several large technology corporations will urge the U.S. Supreme Court today to continue to shield businesses and innovators from legal responsibility if their products or services are used by consumers for illegal acts.

The companies, including industry giants Microsoft Corp., Yahoo Inc., Google, America Online Inc. and Apple Computer Inc., will argue in court filings that the innovations that have helped fuel U.S. economic growth could grind to a halt if protections from liability were stripped away.

[…] The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments March 29 in a suit brought by the motion picture and recording industries against Grokster, one of the leading “peer-to-peer” filing-sharing services […]”

SOURCE: Wash. Post

Note: The CDT (et al.) brief mentioned in the article is available (PDF) here.

David posted this at 6:42 pm ET | Filed in Intellectual Property, P2P | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
January 21, 2005

Powell to Resign FCC Chairmanship

“Michael K. Powell will step down as chairman of the Federal Communications Commission after nearly four often-rocky years as the government’s top media and telecommunications regulator, the agency has confirmed.

Powell, 41, the son of outgoing Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, informed his bureau heads this morning of his decision, which he said was not spurred by another job offer, according to an FCC source who asked not to be identified. The chairman’s exit likely will come within three months, said the source. The announcement is expected to come at around noon today […]”

SOURCE: Wash. Post

David posted this at 1:59 pm ET | Filed in People | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
January 19, 2005

State bill could cripple P2P

“A bill introduced in California’s Legislature last week has raised the possibility of jail time for developers of file-swapping software who don’t stop trades of copyrighted movies and songs online.

The proposal, introduced by Los Angeles Sen. Kevin Murray, takes direct aim at companies that distribute software such as Kazaa, eDonkey or Morpheus. If passed and signed into law, it could expose file-swapping software developers to fines of up to $2,500 per charge, or a year in jail, if they don’t take “reasonable care” in preventing the use of their software to swap copyrighted music or movies–or child pornography.

[…] Peer-to-peer software companies and their allies immediately criticized the bill as a danger to technological innovation, and as potentially unconstitutional […]”

SOURCE: CNET News.com

Note: Ed Felten has more on the potential ramifications of the bill here.

David posted this at 3:11 pm ET | Filed in Intellectual Property, P2P, State & Local | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
January 18, 2005

One Last Election Lesson

“The November election may feel like ancient history, but it is still going on in North Carolina. The state has been unable to swear in an agriculture commissioner because a single malfunctioning electronic voting machine lost more ballots than the number of votes that separate the two candidates. The State Board of Elections, the candidates and the public are sharply divided on how to proceed. The mess North Carolina finds itself in is a cautionary tale about the perils of relying on electronic voting that does not produce a paper record.

When the returns came in for the agriculture commissioner race, two things were clear: the Republican, Steve Troxler, and the Democrat, Britt Cobb, were just 2,287 votes apart, and a voting machine in Carteret County had lost 4,438 votes. The machine had mistakenly been set to keep roughly 3,000 votes in its memory, which was not enough. And in a spectacularly poor design decision, it was programmed to let people keep “voting” even when their votes were not being saved.

[…] North Carolina’s plight underscores a basic point about elections: because there are often problems, there must be a mechanism for a recount. If the Carteret County voting machine had produced a voter-verified paper record each time a vote was cast, these paper records could have been be counted and the matter would be resolved. But electronic voting machines that do not produce paper records make recounts impossible […]”

SOURCE: NY Times

Note: ACM issued a statement in 2004 calling for, among other things, improved reliability, security, and verifiability of public elections.

David posted this at 9:30 am ET | Filed in E-voting, Opinion | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
January 13, 2005

French researcher charged with violating copyright laws

Ed Felten has an interesting post on his “Freedom To Tinker” weblog right now regarding a French researcher who has been charged with violating copyright laws for publishing the results of his research.

CNET News.com has the story, here, as well.

David posted this at 12:33 pm ET | Filed in Intellectual Property | Permanent Link | Trackback

 

Sen. Hatch to chair new intellectual property subcommittee

Senator Orrin Hatch will be the chair of a new intellectual property subcommittee in the Senate Judiciary Committee, according to National Journal’s Technology Daily [subscription req’d].

As chair of the full Judiciary Committee in the 108th Congress, Hatch sponsored the controversial “Induce Act,” which ultimately failed to win approval.

USACM was very involved in the Induce Act debate, writing to Senator Hatch to express reservations about the legislation and joining a broad coalition that voiced concerns regarding the U.S. Copyright Office’s input on the act’s secondary liability language.

David posted this at 10:19 am ET | Filed in Intellectual Property | Permanent Link | Trackback

 

Ridge wants fingerprints in passports

“The United States should issue passports that include a full set of the bearer’s fingerprints, Tom Ridge, the departing secretary of homeland security, said Wednesday. Mr. Ridge said the change would induce foreign governments to do the same on the passports they issue.

Privacy advocates promised to fight the Ridge suggestion, in part because it would deliver the prints of American travelers to foreign governments, and the State Department has been cool to it as well.

[…] At the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a nonprofit group here, Marc Rotenberg, the president, said that providing foreign governments with the fingerprints of each American visitor would “make it easier for those foreign governments to conduct their own investigations of U.S. citizens in that foreign country.”

SOURCE: NY Times

David posted this at 9:54 am ET | Filed in Privacy, Biometrics | Permanent Link | Trackback

 

Snooping by satellite

“When Robert Moran drove back to his law offices in Rome, N.Y., after a plane trip to Arizona in July 2003, he had no idea that a silent stowaway was aboard his vehicle: a secret GPS bug implanted without a court order by state police.

Police suspected the lawyer of ties to a local Hells Angels Motorcycle Club that was selling methamphetamine [… so] investigators stuck a GPS, or Global Positioning System, bug on Moran’s car, watched his movements, and arrested him on drug charges a month later.

A federal judge in New York ruled last week that police did not need court authorization when tracking Moran from afar. “Law enforcement personnel could have conducted a visual surveillance of the vehicle as it traveled on the public highways,” U.S. District Judge David Hurd wrote. “Moran had no expectation of privacy in the whereabouts of his vehicle on a public roadway […]”

SOURCE: CNET News.com

David posted this at 9:50 am ET | Filed in Privacy, Surveillance | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
January 12, 2005

Privacy at DHS

“Privacy advocates interested in Secure Flight and other Homeland Security Department screening programs say the incoming secretary at DHS must form a good relationship with the agency’s chief privacy officer, Nuala O’Connor Kelly.

Kelly has had a good rapport with Tom Ridge, outgoing DHS secretary, said Jim Dempsey, executive director of the Center for Democracy and Technology. “The significance of that office will depend on her relationship with the new secretary,” said Dempsey, speaking today at a security and privacy workshop at the Commerce Department. The American Bar Association sponsored the workshop. […]”

SOURCE: FCW

David posted this at 12:55 pm ET | Filed in Privacy, People | Permanent Link | Trackback

 

DHS losing another computer security official

“The Homeland Security Department official in charge of protecting the nation’s physical and computer infrastructure is stepping down at the end of the month in the latest in a string of departures at the department’s struggling cyber-security division.

The announcement by Robert P. Liscouski, the department’s assistant secretary for infrastructure protection, comes as technology executives and experts increasingly say that the Bush administration is giving short shrift to computer security […]”

SOURCE: Washington Post

David posted this at 10:10 am ET | Filed in Security | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
January 11, 2005

DHS nominee a data-mining advocate

“Michael Chertoff, the appeals court judge who President Bush today nominated to become Homeland Security secretary, was an early advocate of data mining to pinpoint terrorists.

From 2001 to 2003, he spearheaded the Justice Department’s legal counterattack against al-Qaida as assistant attorney general for the Criminal Division. In that job, he sponsored the use of advanced analytic techniques to probe diverse and vast financial records to mine evidence linking terrorists to their paymasters and one another […]”

SOURCE: GCN

David posted this at 2:31 pm ET | Filed in Privacy, Security, People | Permanent Link | Trackback

 

Pew survey on future of the Internet

The Pew Internet & American Life Project has released The Future of the Internet, a survey of technology experts and scholars evaluating where the Internet is headed in the next ten years.

The full report is available (PDF) here.

David posted this at 11:56 am ET | Filed in Research | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
January 10, 2005

President’s 2006 budget request said to be leaner on technology spending

“[…] Mr. Bush plans to submit his budget to Congress early next month. Officials at the affected agencies said he would propose a virtual freeze for the National Science Foundation and a very small increase for the National Institutes of Health.

[…] For the current fiscal year, Congress cut the budget of the National Science Foundation by about 2 percent, to $5.47 billion, and the White House Office of Management and Budget initially proposed a further cut of about 5 percent for 2006. But the agency appealed, with support from allies like Senator Christopher S. Bond, Republican of Missouri, and the White House decided to propose a flat budget, instead of cuts.

[…] Mr. Bush will try again to end the Advanced Technology Program in the Commerce Department, which is spending $142 million this year to speed development of high-risk technologies in medicine, manufacturing, engineering, computer science and other fields […]”

SOURCE: NY Times

Note: Peter Harsha (CRA) has more on this subject here.

David posted this at 11:34 am ET | Filed in Research, Funding | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
January 5, 2005

Cem Kaner on e-voting auditability

Responding to an earlier letter to the editor in the NY Times, Cem Kaner (professor of software engineering at the Florida Institute of Technology, IEEE e-voting working group member, and USACM member) has written a letter focusing on e-voting auditability and the standards-making process:

I serve on the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers P1583 working group that is drafting the electronic voting equipment standard. The managing director of the I.E.E.E. Standards Association says (letter, Dec. 31) that “the draft standard includes criteria for a voter-verified paper trail performance.”

In fact, proposals for verifiable voting records have been rejected out of hand in this committee. As a public relations gesture, the standard includes an addendum that defines, but very specifically does not require, verifiable voting.

Current electronic voting machines cannot be proved trustworthy because they are unauditable. When totals on these machines differ from exit poll projections, we have no empirical way to determine which numbers are correct […]

ACM issued a statement in 2004 calling for, among other things, improved reliability, security, and verifiability of public elections.

David posted this at 11:52 am ET | Filed in E-voting, Opinion | Permanent Link | Trackback

 

New chair for U.S. Election Assistance Commission

“In a ceremony led by Members of Congress, the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) today installed the Hon. Gracia Hillman as chair of the agency.

[…] Hillman, a former executive director of the League of Women Voters of the U.S., will hold the EAC leadership position for one year. She is a Democratic appointee who served as EAC vice chair during 2004, its first year in existence.

[…] Federal law requires EAC to carry out research studies and produce voluntary guidance on a range of topics in 2005. EAC is working with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to develop updated voluntary voting systems standards and recommendations for making e-voting equipment more secure […]”

SOURCE: EAC

David posted this at 9:57 am ET | Filed in E-voting | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
January 4, 2005

New privacy laws in California

“Californians entered the new year with the assurance their cell phone numbers cannot be automatically added to the 411 database, the ability to sue spammers and the comfort of knowing rental car companies cannot track their travels, thanks to a spate of privacy-enhancing laws that went into effect Jan. 1.

Those outside California’s borders may benefit as well […]”

SOURCE: Wired News

David posted this at 9:09 am ET | Filed in Privacy, State & Local | Permanent Link | Trackback

 
 
 
Questions? Comments?
Email us