ACM
POLICY'98
Shaping Policy in the Information
Age
Conference Overview | Participation
| Agenda | Policy
& Ethics Topics
Registration
| Sponsors | Accommodations
| News | Policy98
Home | Graphics Version
Intellectual Property in Cyberspace
Focus Area
In The News |
Organizations | Documents
| Legislation |
Law Cases
Chronology
| Glossary |
References |
Universal Service
| Electronic Commerce |
Intellectual Property in Cyberspace
|
Learning Online
There are many complicated economic, political, and technical issues surrounding
intellectual property and copyrights in cyberspace. The U.S. government,
other nation states, as well as international organizations, such as the
World Intellectual Property Organization, are striving vigorously to resolve
these issues in order to facilitate the growth of electronic commerce and
innovation of new digital media; most significantly the Internet.
Many are concerned, however, with the prospect of governments "over-protecting"
intellectual property (the Minimalists); while others
are nervous about the possibility of having little or no protection for
the creators and owners of intellectual works "published" on the Internet
(the Maximalists).
In December of 1996 the WIPO
(World Intellectual Property Organization) revised its Copyright Treaty
in an effort to preserve and apply copyright standards and principles to
the digital environment. How will this impact copyright in cyberspace?
The U.S. Congress, the White House, the private sector, as well as the
public sector are all examining a variety of digital copyright
propositions that will most benefit proprietors and consumers. But
how should intellectual property be protected? What safeguards, for instance,
are necessary to protect public access traditionally offered by libraries
and academic institutions?
Those involved with the cyberspace copyright debate are now realizing
that striking a balance between consumer rights (such as maintaining free
access to government web sites) with the rights of entrepreneurs is a difficult
juggling act with dire consequences.
Back
to Top
In The News
EFF
Action Alert on H.R. 2651 -- The Databse Copyright Bill -- May 4,
1998
The Collections of Information Antipiracy Act is due to hit the floor
for a congressional vote on May 5, 1998. This action alert describes the
bill and suggest action to take to stifle its passage.
Coble-Hatch
Bill Passes Senate-Judiciary Committee -- April 30,
1998
The controversial Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) passed the
Senate Judiciary Committee. The bill was amended to remove industry objections
to the reverse engineering restrictions and provisions that made on-line
service providers liable for copyright infringements on their sites.
Related
News from Wired News Service -- April 30, 1998
From Porn Sites
to Domain Fees, Trademarks in Turmoil on Web -- April 27,
1998
A review of several new domain name copyright issues. The article looks
at the emerging dispute between the owners of the Citigroup site and the
merged company of Citicorp and Travelers Group. Also contains an examination
of the troubles big corporations are having protecting their trademarks
from being used by pornographic wbe sites.
Net
Piracy: You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet -- April 23, 1998
Internet software piracy is growing at 700 percent a year and could
make traditional forms of
piracy appear quaint by comparison, according to the Business
Software Alliance.
12
Year Old Wins Domain Name Patent Dispute -- April 23, 1998
Christopher Van Allen, or "Pokey" to his family and friends, has won
a legal battle with Prema toys, the legal owner of the Gumby and Pokey
line of toys. Christopher was fighting to retain ownership of his domain,
pokey.org. Art Clokely, inventor of the Gumby and Pokey
toys recently found out about the lawsuit and ordered Prema's lawyers to
withdraw their case. For more information about the case, read an earlier
story.
AAAS Urges
Delay on H.R. 2652 -- April 20, 1998
The AAAS recently sent a letter to Newt Gingrich, urging congress to
delay action on the bill until such a time that the impacts to American
science can be adequately considered.
Tribunal
Torpedoes "Cyber Pirate" -- April 17, 1998
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals orders a man to stop his practice
of registering Net addresses
and offering to sell them to the companies that rightfully hold the trademarks.
The court rejected the defendant's claim that a domain name is nothing
more than an address, arguing "a significant purpose of a domain name is
to identify the entity that owns the Web site."
Copyright
Protection or Copyright Perversion? -- April 7, 1998
A copyright protection bill designed to guard the intellectual property
of software companies has whipped up a storm of criticism from a number
of the very folks it was supposed to benefit. Software industry representatives
argue that the restrictions in H.R. 2281 (the WIPO implementation legislation)
against reverse engineering would preserve the dominance of industry leaders
such as Microsoft.
U.S.
Writer, Scientist ask for animal-human patent -- April 2, 1998
Jeremy Rifkin, a long time opponent of genetic engineering experiments,
and Stuart Newman, a cellular biologist at New York Medical College, have
teamed up to apply for a intellectual property patent on creating animal-human
'chimeras'. Their novel intent is to use the patent to legally prevent
anyone from doing these kinds of experiments.
Congress
Pushes Copyright Bills -- April 1, 1998
News article from CNET that covers the current status of two intellectual
property bills currently in Congress: HR2281 which would ratify international
treaties on intellectual property, and HR3209, the On-Line
Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act.
Maximum
Copyright, Minimum Use -- March 31, 1998
A look at the resurgence of restrictive copyright legislation in Europe
by Pamela Samuelson. The copyright debate in Europe is important for Americans
to watch because "if copyright maximalism prevails in Europe, Clinton administration
officials may try to resurrect similar legislation that has been stalled
in Congress for the last two years."
EFF
Effector Update on House Resolution 2281 -- March 27,
1998
According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the House "WIPO Copyright
Treaties Implementation Act" (H.R. 2281) would over regulate emerging technologies,
outlaw reverse engineering and encryption security measures, and roll back
fair use privileges. This Action Alert describes the bill and suggest action
to take to stop it.
Berkman Center Opens New Course
on Intellectual Property -- March 25, 1998
Harvard Law Professor William Fisher's experimental cybercourse on
Intellectual Property in Cyberspace opened for registration on Wednesday,
March 25. Registration is free but the class size will be limited. Reading
assignments and background materials will be available to the public.
Encoding
the Law into Digital Libraries -- March 1998
A new article by panel director, Pamela Samuelson, in the March issue
of Communications of the ACM. Samuelson explains the unique challenges
of digital libraries for copyright law and the need for 'technologists'
to take part in the legal discussions. NOTE: An ACM account and
password is required to view the online document.
U.S.
ACM Letter on H.R. 2652 -- March 5, 1998
Letter written in opposition to the "Collections of Information Antipiracy
Act". The ACM U.S. Public Policy Committee believes that H.R. 2652 would
impose substantial limitations on the "fair-use" of academic databases
that would unnecessarily impinge academic progress and freedom. From ACM's
collection of Copyright and
Intellectual Property information.
The Good,
Bad, and the Ugly, of Copyright Law Rewrites -- January 8,
1998
An excellent overview of recent copyright legislation in congress by
David Loundy for the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin.
The
Cathedral and the Bazaar -- June 1997
Eric Raymond's influential paper on open source development philosophy
that convinced Netscape's Jim Barksdale to release the software code for
Netscape Communicator 5.0.
Back
to Top
General
American Committee for Interoperable
Systems
ACIS was created to support policies and principles of intellectual
property which
provide a careful balance between the goals of strong protection and
rewards for
innovation and the goals of interoperability, fair competition, and
open systems.
The Society for Information Management
The Society for Information Management is an international organization
for top
information executives including chief information officers, vice presidents
of information services organizations, and key staff members from leading
U.S. and international
corporations and government agencies. Other members are noted educators,
researchers, and systems executives at institutions of higher learning.
American Society for Information Science
The ASIS is a society for information professionals and academics from
such fields as
computer science, linguistics, management, librarianship, engineering,
law, medicine,
chemistry, and education; sharing a common interest in improving the
ways society
stores, retrieves, analyzes, manages, archives and disseminates information.
The Internet Society
The Internet Society is an international organization for global cooperation
and
coordination for the Internet and its internetworking technologies
and applications.
Members reflect the breadth of the entire Internet community and consist
of individuals, corporations, non-profit organizations, and government
agencies.
Back
to Top
Mailing Lists
The Law and Policy of Computer Communications
CYBERIA- L@listserv.aol.com
Send the following message to listserv@listserv.aol.com
subscribe cyberia-l Firstname Lastname
EFFector-Online
US-based Electronic Frontier Foundation's biweekly newsletter covering
privacy rights, freedom of speech in digital media, intellectual property,
and other
issues related to computer-based communications media.
Send the following message to listserv@eff.org
subscribe effector-online
Intellectual Property Caucus Discussion List
The Conference on College Composition and Communication's Caucus on
Intellectual
Property and Composition Studies' list on intellectual property law,
copyright and related legal and political issues affecting the work of
scholars of rhetoric and communication; issues related to teaching, writing,
research, and publishing, including fair use and distribution of text.
Send the following message to listserv@rhet.agri.umn.edu
subscribe cccc-ip Firstname Lastname
Computers in Law
Send the following message to info-law-request@brl.mil
or
info-law- request@brl.mil.arpa
subscribe info-law Firstname Lastname
Legal Bytes
Quarterly newsletter from the Texas law firm of George, Donaldson &
Ford;
intellectual property, copyright, computer communications and related
topics.
Send the following message to legal-bytes-Request@io.com
subscribe legal-bytes.
Union for the Public Domain
One is called UPD-DISCUSS, for unmoderated discussions of UPD issues.
The second is called UPD-ANNOUNCE, which is like a newsletter, for occasional
alerts or notices about things like UPD elections or changes in by-laws.
The third is called DB-ACTION, which is an unmoderated discussion list
devoted exclusively to discussion of the database "extraction rights" issue.
To subscribe to these mailing lists, send a note to LISTPROC@ESSENTIAL.ORG
with messages like
sub UPD-DISCUSS <your
name>
sub UPD-ANNOUNCE <your
name>
sub DB-ACTION <your
name>
E-CARM -- Electronic Commerce and Rights Management
E-CARM is an electronic forum for the discussion of secure transactions,
competing rights management models, the challenges posed by the buying
and selling of intangible goods, measurement and accountability, and other
related issues.
To subscribe, send a message to e-carm-request@lists.kc-inc.net
with just the keyword 'SUBSCRIBE' in the body.
Back
to Top
Maximalists/Clinton Administration
Government Organizations
U.S. Department of Commerce
Engages in a variety of trade promotion activities such as conducting
international
markets and opening access across nations while ensuring the intellectual
property rights of U.S. businesses.
U.S. Copyright Office
Adheres to the U.S. Constitution and promotes the progress of science
and useful arts by securing for limited times to authors and investors
the exclusive right to their respective
writings and discoveries.
U.S. Patents and Trademarks Office
Currently advocates stringent new rules that would further protect
copyright holders in a global digital environment.
U.S. Federal Communications Commission
The U.S. Federal Communications Commission, as an independent government
agency, encourages competition in all communication markets, protects the
public interest, and develops as well as implements policy which guides
converging interstate and international communications like radio, television,
wire, satellite, and cable.
World
Intellectual Property Organization
Passed in 1996, the WIPO is an international copyright treaty that
intensified copyright
protection on the Internet.
Private Interest/Industry Organizations
Creative Incentive Coalition
The Creative Incentive Coalition represents individuals and organizations
supporting copyright on the Internet and ratification of two new international
treaties adopted at the World Intellectual Property Organization Diplomatic
Conference in Geneva in 1996. These treaties require nations around the
world to strengthen copyright laws and would extend copyright protections
to cyberspace.
Intellectual Property Owners
IPO is the only association that represents the interests of all owners
of intellectual property. IPO differs from bar associations by focusing
exclusively on protecting rights of ownership of property. Although it
has attorney members, IPO does not deal with issues relating to private
practice of law. IPO represents the broadest possible range of interests
in ownership.
Software Publishers Association
The Software Publishers Association (SPA) seeks to promote and protect
the computer software industry in legal and policy debates by lobbying
government
officials, organizing grass roots activism and participating in landmark
legal
decisions.
Business Software Association
The Business Software Alliance (BSA) promotes the continued growth
of the software industry through its international
public policy, enforcement, and education programs
in 65 countries throughout North America, Europe, Asia, Latin America,
the Middle East and Africa. Founded in 1988.
Back
to Top
Minimalists/"Fair Use" Proponents
USACM Copyright
USACM contributes to the development of policy governing copyright
and intellectual
property in electronic media as well as tracking national and international
legislation in
the field.
Electronic
Frontier Foundation
A non-profit civil liberties organization that works in the public
interest to protect
privacy, free expression, and access to public resources and information
on-line, as well as promotes responsibility in new media. They maintain
an extensive archive
of relevant Intellectual Property documents and articles.
Digital Future Coalition (DFC)
The Digital Future Coalition is committed to striking an appropriate
balance in law and
public policy between protecting intellectual property and affording
public access to it.
Representing over 2 million Americans, the DFC is the result of a unique
collaboration of 39 of the nation's leading non-profit educational,
scholarly, library, and
consumer groups, together with major commercial trade associations
representing
leaders in the consumer electronics, telecommunications, computer,
and network
access industries.
Home Recording Rights Coalition
The Home Recording Coalition is a coalition of consumers, consumer
groups, trade
associations, retailers and consumer electronics manufacturers, dedicated
to preserving
your right to purchase and use home audio and video recording products
for
noncommercial purposes.
American Research Libraries
Federal Relations and Information Policy Program
They monitor activities resulting from legislative, regulatory, or
operating practices of
international and domestic government agencies and other relevant bodies
on matters of concern to research libraries; prepares analyses of and responses
to federal information policies; influences federal action on issues related
to research libraries; examines issues of importance to the development
of research libraries; and develops ARL positions on issues that reflect
the needs and interests of members.
Union for the Public Domain
A public advocacy group that attempts to preserve and broaden the public
domain while maintaining a balance between 'fair use' and intellectual
property. They also maintain an excellent page
of resources on the current database extraction bill, H.R. 2652.
Center for Democracy and Technology
The CDT advocates public policies that advance constitutional civil
liberties and
democratic values in new computer and communications technologies.
Computer Professionals
for Social Responsibility
CPSR is a public interest alliance of computer scientists and others
interested in the
impact of computer technology on society. CPSR provides current information
on the
Telecom Bill and the Communications Decency Act, on the Clipper Chip,
on Caller-ID, on privacy and civil liberties in cyberspace, and intellectual
property.
Negativland
Home page for the band Negativland. After losing a highly publicized
lawsuit with the
band U2 over the issue of sampling, they have become strong and vocal
advocates
of an expanded concept of fair-use. They maintain an excellent collection
of resources
and commentaries on the issue of intellectual property rights.
Free Software Foundation
Famous foundation started by Richard Stallman to give away the software
for GNU, a free version of UNIX. Argues all software should be free and
advocates a 'copyleft' standard for web publications.
American Libraries Association
The ALA tracks and influences intellectual property law and policy
ALA by maintaining a vigorous program to defend libraries' rights to shelve
and circulate materials
representing all points of view to all people regardless of race, religion,
age, national
origin or social and political views.
Back
to Top
Documents
General/Overview
Back
to Top
Back
to Top
Minimalists/"Fair Use" Proponents
The
Copyright Grab
In this article Pamela Samuelson argues that "the White Paper in fact
seeks to implement
the maximalists agenda partly by rewriting the copyright statute and
partly by
aggressively interpreting existing law. Yet we should also not assume
that these
copyright maximalists are good judges of what's in their long-term
best interest. Pushing
through legislation mandating the maximalist vision before there is
public consensus in
support of it could backfire by eroding the public's faith in the essential
fairness of
copyright law." Also, read a response
to this article from John Newcomb on behalf of the Creative
Incentive Coalition.
Designing
a Web of Intellectual Property
The authors, Terje Norderhaug and Juliet Oberding, make a strong case
for a
proactive effort by Web technology designers to increase intellectual
property
protections.
Economy
of Ideas
A thought provoking critique of our current emphasis on intellectual
property rights.
Barlow argues persuasively that propety law will fail because "digital
technolgy is
detaching infromation from the physical plane where [it] has always
found definition."
Also read responses
to his article.
Why Software
Should not Have Owners
Thought provoking article from the Free Software Foundation on the
benefits to software development of free distribution.
Back
to Top
Legislation
Pending Legislation
H.R. 2652
- Collections of Information Antipiracy Act -- Status
Collections of Information Antipiracy Act - Amends Federal copyright
law to make persons who extract, or use in commerce, a substantial part
of a collection of information gathered or maintained by another person
through the investment of substantial resources, so as to harm the other
person's actual or potential market for a product or service that incorporates
such information and is offered in commerce liable to the person for remedies
under this Act.
H.R.
3048 - Digital Era Copyright Enhancement Act -- Status
A bill to update and preserve balance in the Copyright Act for the
21st Century; to advance
educational opportunities through distance learning; to implement the
World Intellectual Property Organization Copyright Treaty and Performances
and Phonograms Treaty, and for other purposes.
S. 1146 -
Digital Copyright Clarification and Technology Act -- Status
Digital Copyright Clarification and Technology Education Act of 1997
- Title I: Digital Copyright Clarification - Amends Federal copyright law
to absolve a person of liability for direct, vicarious, or contributory
copyright infringement arising out of: (1) providing electronic communications
network services or facilities with respect to infringement by a user;
(2) supplying a private electronic communication for which such person
lacks the technical ability or authority to access or disclose such communication
to a third party or supplying real-time communication formats; or (3) supplying
a user of network services or facilities with a site-linking aid or directory,
a navigational aid, or the tools for creating a site-linking aid.
H.R. 2281
and S. 1121 - WIPO Treaties Implementation Act -- Status
WIPO Copyright Treaties Implementation Act - Amends Federal copyright
law to grant copyright protection to: (1) sound recordings that were first
fixed in a treaty party (a country or intergovernmental organization other
than the United States that is a party to specified international copyright
and other agreements); and (2) pictorial, graphic, or scuptural works incorporated
in a building or other structure or an architectural work embodied in a
building located in the United States or a treaty party.
H.R. 2180
- On-Line Copyright Liability Limitation Act -- Status
On-Line Copyright Liability Limitation Act - Amends Federal copyright
law to exempt a person from being liable for direct infringement, or vicariously
liable for the infringing acts of another, based solely on transmitting
or otherwise providing access to material on-line, if the person does not:
(1) initially place the material on-line; (2) generate, select, or alter
the content of the material; (3) determine the recipients of the material;
(4) receive a financial benefit directly attributable to a particular act
of infringement; (5) sponsor, endorse, or advertise the material; and (6)
know, and is not aware by notice or other information indicating, that
the material is infringing, or is prohibited by law from accessing the
material.
Legal Cases
-
Tasini vs. The
New York Times (1997)
According to the National Writers Union this "is the landmark lawsuit
brought by
members of NWU against The New York Times Company, Newsday Inc., Time
Inc.,
Lexis/Nexis, and University Microfilms Inc., charging copyright violation
regarding the
electronic reuse of work produced and sold on a freelance basis. For
decades, when
freelance writers sold stories to American publications it was understood
by all
concerned that they were selling only First North American Serial rights
which allowed
the newspaper or magazine to publish the story in print one time. For
freelance authors, retention of all other copy rights is crucial to their
economic survival because a
significant additional source of income comes from their ability to
sell secondary rights
such as syndication, translations, anthologies, and so forth, to other
publications. Yet
parent companies of electronic media claim, without justification,
that by
purchasing First North American Serial rights they automatically gain
electronic re-
publication rights" (1997).
-
Religious Technology Center and Bridge Publications Inc. v. Netcom
(1997)
The copyright holder and publisher, respectively, of the Church of
Scientology materials have sued Netcom and a church dissident for copyright
and trade secret violations because the dissident used his Netcom account
to post church teachings (news.com).
-
Sega vs. Accolade(1990)
This case affirmed the right of software developers to decompile software
for
compatibility purposes. This right however is currently under siege.
According to
Pamela Samuelson, "the White Paper [and several copyright legislation
currently on the
Hill] doesn't mention the decompilation and interoperability case law
at all. Lehman and the maximalist software publishers who used to be his
clients continue to believe that
decompilation is and should be illegal. They are hoping to overturn
the decompilation
case law indirectly by the white paper's endorsement of some changes
to commercial
law that would validate common terms in shrink-wrap licenses, such
as prohibitions on
decompilation"(1995).
Chronology
1790: US Constitution
Copyright law in the US is derived from English copyright law (Statute
of Anne) and common law. The framers of the U.S. Constitution made copyright
law purely federal: "The Congress shall have power . . . to promote the
progress of science and useful arts . . . by securing for limited times
to authors and inventors the exclusive rights to their respective writings
and discoveries." Congress subsequently enacted the Copyright Act of 1790
and major revisions to it in 1831, 1870, 1909, and 1976.
1841: Folsom vs. Marsh
This case is the source of the fair use doctrine in the United States.
At issue was use of George Washington's private letters in the creation
of a fictionalized biography of the President without the permission of
the owner of the letters. The court found that there was not an infringement
and in handing down the decision Justice Storey stated: "In short, we must
often, in deciding questions of this sort, look to the nature and objects
of the selections made, the quantity and value of the materials used, and
the degree in which the use may prejudice the sale or diminish the profits,
or supersede the objects, of the original work."
1886: Berne
Convention
The goals of the Berne Convention provide the basis for mutual recognition
of copyright between sovereign nations in foreign works and promote development
of international norms with regard to copyright protection. The Convention
was a diplomatic joiner of European nations seeking to establish a mutually
satisfactory uniform copyright law to replace the need for separate registration
in every country. It has been revised five times since 1886. Of particular
note are the revisions in 1908 and 1928. In 1908, the Berlin Act set the
duration of copyright at life of the author plus 50 years, expanded the
scope of the act to include newer technologies, and prohibited formalities
as a prerequisite of copyright protection. In 1928, the Rome Act first
recognized the moral rights of authors and artists - giving them the right
to object to modifications or to the destruction of a work in a way that
might prejudice or decrease the artist's reputation. In 1988, the United
States became a Berne signatory.
1909: Revision of the U.S.
Copyright Act
A major revision of the U.S. Copyright Act was completed in 1909. Key
aspects of this revision are: a broadening of the scope of categories protected
to include all works of authorship, and an extension of the number of years
in a renewal term (14-28) for a total of 56 years of protection. With this
legislation, the attention is focused away from regulating the marketplace
to proprietary rights. In addressing new categories of materials available
for copyright the Congress addressed the difficulty of balancing the public
interest with proprietor's rights.
1976: Revision of the U.S.
Copyright Act
The 1976 revision was undertaken for two primary reasons. First, technological
developments and their impact on what might be copyrighted, how works might
be copied, and what constituted an infringement needed to be addressed.
Second, the revision was undertaken in anticipation of Berne Convention
adherence by the U.S. It was felt that the statute needed to be amended
to bring the United States into accord with international copyright law,
practices, and policies. The 1976 Act preempted all previous copyright
law in the United States. The Act covered the following areas: Scope and
Subject Matter of Works Covered, Exclusive Rights, Copyright Term, Copyright
Notice and Copyright Registration, Copyright Infringement, Fair Use and
Defenses and Remedies to Infringement. With this revision, for the first
time the fair use and first sale doctrines were codified, and copyright
was extended to unpublished works.
1986: Maxtone-Graham vs. Burtchaell
Burtchaell wrote a book that aimed to educate the public about abortions.
He sought and was denied permission to excerpt from a book by Maxtone-
Graham that contained interviews with women about their experiences with
pregnancy and abortion. The court found in favor of the defendants in all
four fair use factors.
1987: Salinger vs. Random House
A second circuit appeals court found that use (not copying but quoting
or paraphrasing) of unpublished materials in an unauthorized biography
of J.D. Salinger was not fair use.
1988: Berne
Convention
The United States became a Berne signatory and it was effective in
Statutory law. The major changes for the U.S. copyright system as a result
of Berne were: greater protection for proprietors, new copyright relations
with 24 additional countries, and elimination of the requirement of a copyright
notice on a copyrighted work.
1990: Circulation of Computer Software
Congress amended the Copyright Act to prohibit commercial lending of
computer software. The amendment noted that libraries could lend software
provided "copy of a computer program which is lent by such library has
affixed to the packaging containing the program a warning of copyright."
This amendment is a modification of the first sale doctrine.
1990: Immunity of State Governments
Congress amended the Copyright Act to ensure that state universities
would not be immune from being sued for monetary damages in federal court.
State and private universities are now subject to the same copyright regulations,
and may be sued for copyright infringement. (The eleventh amendment to
the U.S. constitution precludes states from being sued in federal courts.)
1991: Fiesta Publications v. Rural Telephone Service Co., Inc.
The Supreme Court found that the compilation of a telephone directory
by Fiesta was not an infringement even though it was compiled from the
information in the Rural Telephone Service White Pages. The information
in the white pages was not copyrightable because it is public information.
1992: Amendment to Sec. 304 of Title 17
Amendment to Sec. 304 of Title 17 that made copyright renewal automatic,
and, by that means alone, dramatically curtailed the entry into the public
domain of works protected by copyright before 1978.
1993: Playboy Enterprises Inc. v. Fern
The courts held that the Playboy's distribution rights were infringed
when one of their photographs was digitized and placed on an electronic
commercial bulletin board system by one subscriber and downloaded by another
subscriber.
1993: NII Initiative
The Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights was established to
explore the application and effectiveness of copyright law and the NII.
The NII is described as "a seamless web of communications networks, computers,
databases, and consumer electronics." (Information Infrastructure Task
Force, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, National
Information Infrastructure: Agenda for Action, 1993).
1994: Campbell v. Cuff-Rose Music, Inc.
The Supreme Court ruled that a rap parody of Roy Orbison's song, "Pretty
Woman," was a fair use. The court found that a commercial use could be
a fair use especially when the markets for an original work and a transformative
work may be different.
1994: Working Group's Green Paper
The Working Group sponsored a series of activities to solicit input
on copyright issues and the NII. These included public hearings and in
June 1994, a draft NII report was circulated for comment and review (the
Green Paper). Part of the review process included three hearings (held
in Los Angeles, Chicago, and Washington, DC) hosted by the Working Group,
where members of the stockholder community presented statements of reaction
to the Green Paper. AL submitted a response to the Green Paper and was
represented by a witness at all three hearings.
1994: CONFU.
In addition to making legislative recommendations in the White Paper,
the Working Group sponsored a Conference on Fair Use (CONFU). Established
in September 1994, CONFU is the venue for development of guidelines for
Fair Use in the electronic environment. CONFU participants have been working
toward development of guidelines for a number of areas including: interlibrary
loan, electronic reserves, visual images, and distance education.
1995: Religious Technology Center v. Netcom
A federal judge in California has ruled that Netcom may be held liable
for copyright infringement because the company did not remove copyrighted
materials posted by a subscriber. The judge's ruling included an important
distinction: that Netcom may be liable for "contributory" copyright infringement,
not direct or vicarious infringement.
1995: S. 989 and H.R. 483
A Copyright Term Extension bill under consideration in Congress would
add 20 years to the term of copyright protection for almost all published
works, and at least 10 years to the term of protection for unpublished
ones. A rationale for implementing this legislation is to bring U.S. law
into line with the international community - especially other Berne signatories.
1995: Release of the White Paper
The culmination of the NII Working Group's efforts was release of the
White Paper, in September 1995. The White Paper contains recommendations
to amend the Copyright Act of 1976 and presents a lengthy legal analysis
of current copyright law. Late last year, the White Paper's legislative
amendments and recommendations were introduced in Congress as the NII Copyright
Protection Act of 1995 (S. 1284 and H.R. 2441).
1996: TRIPS
Agreement
TRIPS Agreement which forms part of the Final Act of the Uruguay Round
of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, which has the effect of
restoring to copyright, as of January 1, 1996, works of foreign origin
which are currently in the public domain in the United States.
1996: Database Protection Legislation
On May 23, 1996 the Database Investment and Intellectual Property Antipiracy
Act of 1996 (H.R. 3531) was introduced by Rep. Moorhead to amend Title
15 U.S.C. The bill seeks to "promote investment and prevent intellectual
property piracy with respect to databases." This legislation is comparable
to a European sponsored initiative to protect database producers from unauthorized
extractions of more than an insubstantial part of database contents for
15 years. To some, this legislation appears to be an end run around the
Supreme Court decision Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service
Co., 499 U.S. 340, 349 (1991). Like the NII legislation, careful review
of this initiative will be necessary because of its potential negative
repercussions for science and education.
1997: A Framework for Electronic Commerce, the WIPO treaties, and
US Copyright Law A week before the World Intellectual Property Organization
released its final version of the international treaty which extends copyright
law into the digital environment, the Clinton Administration introduced
its Framework for Electronic Commerce, a white paper produced by the Information
Infrastructure Task Force. Faced with the difficult task of developing
copyright law that both promotes appropriate access for citizens and protects
the rights of producers, Congress is currently examining a variety of legislation
which safeguards intellectual property on all levels. But due to the many
differences that exist between the entertainment, information, telecommunication,
and software companies an accord may not be reached until early next year.
Back
to Top
Glossary
APPLICATION
Completed papers submitted to the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office
seeking a patent
including oath, specification, claims, and drawings.
CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT
Aid to another in infringing a patent (e.g., selling the infringer
an essential portion required
for the completed infringing device, material, article or process).
COPYRIGHT
The exclusive right to the publication, production or sale of the rights
to literary, dramatic,
musical, artistic works or software.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Any form of knowledge or expression created with one's intellect. It
includes such things as inventions, computer software, trademarks, literary,
artistic musical or visual works and even simply know-how.
LICENSE
A right to use an invention as well as the instrument which grants
that right. It allows the
licensee to do things without which license would constitute infringement
on the part of the
licensee.
LICENSEE
The entity which is granted rights to intellectual property by the
owner of that property.
LICENSOR
The owner of intellectual property which grants rights to another (the
licensee) through a
license.
TRADEMARK
A symbol, design, word, letter or other device protected by law and
used to distinguish a
product or products from those of competitors.
Back
to Top
References
-
Who Owns that Online Story? Columbia Journalism Review v36, n1(May-June,
1997):15.
-
WIPO pacts go Digital; Proposed International Treaties will open up Domestic
Debate onTreatment of Electronic Works.National Law Journal v19,
n22(Jan 27, 1997):C1.
-
Cornering Creativity: Large Media Firms Seek to Control Creative Works.
Nation v264, n10(March 17, 1997):10. Jaquet, Janine.
-
The Best Things in Life are Not Free: Copyright in the Internet Age.National
Law Journal v19, n28 (March 10, 1997):A17. DeLong, James V.
-
Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights: Intellectual Property in a Global Economy.
Congressional Digest v75, n12 (Dec. 1996):289.
-
Designing a Web of Intellectual Property.Computer Networks and ISDN
Systemsv27, n6 (1995): 1037-46. Norderhaug, T. & Oberding, J.
Last updated on April 23, 1998. Comments,
Suggestions?