|
The
DMCA was enacted by the U.S. Congress in 1998.
In an overly broad attempt to protect
copyright content, the anti-circumvention provisions
of the Act are having a chilling effect on analysis,
research, and publication. In particular, scientists
and technologists that conduct research in forensics
or other computer security areas face risks of legal
liability simply for reverse engineering security
measures and for reporting the results of their efforts.
USACM continues to recommend that the anti-circumvention
provisions of the legislation be revised to restrict
only circumvention directly involved in infringement.
USACM Position Statement on the DMCA February
6, 2004
USACM Activities
- In a submission to the Congressional Internet Caucus, USACM raised concerns about the chilling effect the DMCA is having on cybersecurity research and the ability of technologists to discover and fix dangerous bugs in code, to analyze and stop malicious code and spyware, and to publish and discuss computing research. USACM recommends a more balanced approach that targets copyright infringement while permitting non-infringing uses of copy-protected works (June 16, 2004).
- USACM sent a letter
to Florida Governor Jeb Bush concerning a broad state DMCA-like measure that
restricts the use of certain computing technology in an effort to
provide additional legal protections for communication services
and digital content. June 9, 2003
- The U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion
in Dastar v. Twentieth Century Fox. By ruling in favor of Dastar, the Court limits the ability of
copyright holders to use the Lanham Act as a super-copyright law. The opinion is welcomed by USACM
and others in the library, higher-education, and computing community. In February, USACM signed a
brief submitted to the Supreme
Court in support of Dastar that sought to explain the potential damaging impact of reversing the legal precedent of leaving facts in the public domain where they
can be incorporated into new works. June 2, 2003
- USACM Co-Chair Barbara Simons offered testimony
before the Copyright Office of the Library of Congress regarding
Section 1201 of the DMCA, which prohibits circumvention of copyright
protected systems for access control technologies. Hearing Transcript.
May 14, 2003
- USACM joined a diverse collection of ibrary, higher-education, and
computing groups in submitting an
amicus brief with the Supreme Court in
Dastar v. Twentieth Century Fox. The brief explains to the court the potential damaging impact of reversing the legal precedent of leaving
facts in the public domain where they can be incorporated into new works. February 25, 2003
- USACM submitted comments to the U.S. Copyright Office as part
of the DMCA rulemaking on exemptions from prohibition on circumvention of technological
measures that control access to copyrighted works. December 18, 2002
- An article
by Jeff Grove on USACM's work to restore balance to US Copyright law. November 15, 2002
- USACM sent a letter to
Representative Rick Boucher (D-VA) commending him on the introduction
of
H.R. 5544, the Digital Media Consumers' Rights Act of 2002. November 1, 2002
- USACM and the Computer Research Association (CRA) reply to Columist article
regarding the impact of the DMCA. August 20, 2002.
- USCAM letter to Senator Ernest F. Hollings,
Chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, expressing concerns
with the potential legislative proposal known as the
Security Systems Standards and Certification Act (SSSCA). September 26, 2001
- ACM Submitted a Declaration
in Felten
vs. RIAA challenge to the DMCA seeking to help the court to understand the DMCA's chilling
effect on analysis and research publication. August 13, 2001
- ACM CEO and Executive Director John White submitted a
letter to U.S. Trade Representative Robert B. Zoellick
urging that DMCA-like anti-circumvention measures be removed from the FTAA treaty
currently under negotiation. August 22, 2001
- USACM Letter to Office of the U.S.
Trade Representative regarding the draft Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) treaty's
intellectual property provisions. As part of the treaty discussions, negotiators
are considering including copyright provisions that would require all nation-signatories
to enact DMCA-like anti-circumvention provisions. August 17, 2001
- USACM response to Senator
Diane Feinstein's statement on opposition to the DMCA. Senator Feinstein,
the Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Technology, Terrorism, and Government
Information, stated that she had heard of no credible opposition to the DMCA. July 31, 2001
- USACM's letter to the Association of
American Publishers regarding AAP's support for the arrest of Dmitry
Sklyarov and the DMCA. Here is the August 1, 2001,
response from the AAP. July 26, 2001
- USACM press release regarding the
effect of the DMCA on academic freedom and speech. May 3, 2001
- HR
2281, The Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
Introduced by Representative Coble, July 29, 1997. Approved by
the House August 4, 1998. Approved by Senate September 17, 1998.
Signed by the President October 28, 1998 (Public Law: 105-304). ACM
provides an overview of litigation in
California, New York, and Connecticut on DVD copying.
ACM President Barbara Simons submitted comments
to the U.S. Copyright Office urging the exemption of certain
classes of works from the prohibition of circumvention in the
DMCA. February 17, 2000
To DVD or Not to DVD
from Communications of the ACM 43, 5 May, 2000. By ACM president Barbara Simons.
ACM past-president Barbara Simons's
deposition on behalf of the defendants
in the New York DeCSS case. July 8, 2000
- USACM member Pamela Samuelson's (see the article titled "Anticircumvention Rules: Threat to Science")
list of articles. September 14, 2001
Related Resources:
- Library of Congress Rulemaking on
Exemptions from Prohibition on Circumvention of Technological Measures that Control Access to Copyrighted Works as dictated by the DMCA.
- Letter
on the impact of HR 2281 from Presidents of eight major
scientific societies,September 14, 1998.
- WIPO letter
from the InfoSec community, August 1, 1998.
- USACM letter
to Senator Snowe (R-ME) on the database provision.
- USACM letter
to Rep Bliley on the circumvention and database
provisions.
- USACM letter on H.R.
2281 and dangers to encryption research and computer security,
June 4, 1998.
- Alert
on bill by CPT, EFF, and EPIC.
- Joint letter from the
Digitial Future Coalition, American Committee for Interoperable
Systems, Consumer Electronics Manufacturers Association, Home
Recording Rights Coalition, Computer and Communications
Industry Association and USACM to Rep. Coble on HR
2281, August 4, 1997.
No Electronic Theft Act
HR
2265, The No Electronic Theft Act, Introduced by
Rep. Goodlatte (R-VA) on July 25, 1997. Approved by House of
Representatives on November 4, 1997. Approved by the Senate on
November 13, 1997. Signed by President, December 16, 1998 (Public
Law 105-147).
Related Resources:
- USACM letter to U.S.
Sentencing Commission on sentencing guidelines for the NET Act,
January 25, 2000.
- USACM letter to
President Clinton on HR
2265, November 25, 1997.
- USACM press
release.
- Summary
of bill from Thomas.
- House Judiciary Committee Report (House
Rpt. 105-339), October 25, 1997.
RELEVANT DOCUMENTS
International Agreements
Reports and Analyses
Previous Legislation
- Letter by USACM
to Rep. Hyde on H.R. 2441, June 4, 1996.
- Letter by USACM to
Senate Judiciary Commitee on S. 1284, June 4, 1996.
- Statement
for the record submitted by USACM to the Subcommittee on
Courts and Intellectual Property, House Judiciary Committee on
HR 2441, Feb. 15, 1996.
- Letter by computer
companies and trade associations expressing concern over
liability issues in HR 2411, Feb. 12, 1996.
- ACM
Letter to U.S. Senate on NII Copyright Protection Act of
1995, December 1995.
- S. 1284, the NII Copyright
Protection Act of 1995, introduced by Senators Hatch and
Leahy.
- Floor statement of Senator Hatch on
S. 1284.
- Statement
of Bruce A. Lehman, Assistant Secretary of Commerce and
Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks on S. 1284 and H.R. 2441
before the Subcommittee on Courts and Intellectual Property
Committee on the Judiciary United States House of
Representatives and the Committee on the Judiciary United
States Senate, November 15, 1995.
|