REAL ID (or the alternative PASS ID proposal) would support and protects a system of so-called ‘gold standard’ drivers licenses.  It would also increase the document requirements to confirm a license holder’s identity and require the digitization of identity documents in order to facilitate identity confirmation and avoid issuing duplicate licenses.  USACM believes in order to accomplish this safely and securely, the system must make sure license data and associated information are available only to those who should have access, and that the system must work very quickly. This would require an extensive nationwide investment in information technology. The state-of-practice for building such large systems and satisfying requirements for security, reliability, survivability and guaranteed real-time performance is lacking. As a result, there is a large possibility of major cost overruns and significant shortcomings. And by making the licenses such an important credential REAL ID could shift the focus of identity thieves away from social security and credit card numbers.  A forged REAL ID poses a greater threat given the increased trust placed in it, and related identity theft would be much harder to restore. USACM sees problems with REAL ID in several areas, including accountability, privacy and security.

Related Articles

Global Technology Policy Update – December 2016
ACM PUBLIC POLICY HIGHLIGHTS Cybersecurity Education and Research in Europe – The ACM Europe Policy Committee released a policy white paper “Advancing Cybersecurity Education and Research in Europe.” Committee Chair Fabrizio Gagliardi recently presented the find ...Read More

  • (Posted on 12-Dec-16)
  • Global Technology Policy Update – October 2016
    ACM PUBLIC POLICY HIGHLIGHTS Computer Science Education and Research in Europe – ACM Europe Policy Committee members will be attending the European Computer Science Summit in Budapest, Hungary on October 24-26, which features programs on the challenges and opportunities in ...Read More

  • (Posted on 09-Oct-16)
  • Global Tech Policy Update – September 2016
    ACM PUBLIC POLICY HIGHLIGHTS Cybersecurity in the United States – The ACM U.S. Public Policy Council submitted comments to the Presidential Commission on Enhancing National Cybersecurity. The comments address the challenges and possible approaches to strengthening cybersecu ...Read More

  • (Posted on 07-Oct-16)
  • Global Tech Policy Update – June 2016
    ACM PUBLIC POLICY HIGHLIGHTS Internet of Things – The ACM U.S. Public Policy Council submitted comments on the Internet of Things to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). The comments describe the challenges and opportunities arising from Io ...Read More

  • (Posted on 14-Jun-16)
  • U.S. Tech Policy Update – June 2016
    CONGRESS Tuesday, June 7, 2016 House Floor: H.R. 4904, MEGABYTE (Making Electronic Government Accountable By Yielding Tangible Efficiencies) Act of 2016 U.S. House of Representatives Markup: FY2017 Labor, HHS & Education Appropriations Bill Senate Appropriations Subcommittee ...Read More

  • (Posted on 06-Jun-16)