Background

Virtually all voting systems in use today (punch-cards, lever machines, hand counted paper ballots, etc.) are subject to fraud and error, including electronic voting systems, which are not without their own risks and vulnerabilities. In particular, many electronic voting systems have been evaluated by independent, generally-recognized experts and have been found to be poorly designed; developed using inferior software engineering processes; designed without (or with very limited) external audit capabilities; intended for operation without obvious protective measures; and deployed without rigorous, scientifically-designed testing.

Recommendations

To protect the accuracy and impartiality of the electoral process, ACM makes the following recommendations:

 ·  All voting systems -- particularly computer-based electronic voting systems -- embody careful engineering, strong safeguards, and rigorous testing in both their design and operation; and,

 ·  Voting systems should also enable each voter to inspect a physical (e.g., paper) record to verify that his or her vote has been accurately cast and to serve as an independent check on the result produced and stored by the system. Making those records permanent (i.e., not based solely in computer memory) provides a means by which an accurate recount may be conducted.

Ensuring the reliability, security, and verifiability of public elections is fundamental to a stable democracy. Convenience and speed of vote counting are no substitute for accuracy of results and trust in the process by the electorate.

 (This policy statement was adopted by both USACM and ACM's Council; therefore, it is an adopted position of ACM. More on this statement and the poll ACM conducted of its Members can be found on the weblog.)

 

Related Articles

Washington News – Alerts and Updates
* USACM sent congratulatory letters to the three new Commissioners of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. The letter recommends reestablishing the Technical Guidelines Development Committee, updating the Voluntary Voting Systems Guidelines, updating the testing and certifica ...Read More

  • (Posted on 25-Feb-15)
  • USACM Congratulates New EAC Commissioners
    USACM has sent letters to each of the three newly sworn-in Commissioners of the Election Assistance Commission (EAC): Thomas Hicks, Matthew Masterson and Christy McCormick.  In the letters, USACM congratulates the new Commissioners, and makes recommendations to the EAC: Reestabli ...Read More

  • (Posted on 19-Feb-15)
  • Washington News – Alerts and Updates
    General News • USACM submitted a statement to the U.S. Copyright Office in support of a proposed security research exemption to the prohibitions against circumvention under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Multiple committees collaborated on the statement. ̶ ...Read More

  • (Posted on 10-Feb-15)
  • NIST and EAC Sponsoring Symposium on Voting Systems Technology
    The Future of Voting Systems Technology Symposium II will take place February 9-10 at the Department of Commerce headquarters in Washington, D.C.  Registration (free) is required and closes on February 3. The symposium is co-sponsored by the National Institute of Standards and Te ...Read More

  • (Posted on 23-Jan-15)
  • Washington News – Alerts and Updates
    General News • The 114th Congress convened last week with Republicans controlling both the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate. The House has 246 Republicans, 188 Democrats, and 1 vacancy due to Rep. Michael Grimm’s resignation on January 5. The Senate has 54 ...Read More

  • (Posted on 14-Jan-15)
  • Senate Confirms Three Commissioners To The Election Assistance Commission
    For several months the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) has been without any Commissioners.  In December the Senate confirmed three nominees as Commissioners: Thomas Hicks, Matthew Masterson and Christy McCormick.  This marks the first time in years that the Commission will h ...Read More

  • (Posted on 31-Dec-14)